Chat with us, powered by LiveChat The topic is ADR in Healthcare Malpractice Write annotated bibliography of at least 150 words for 10 - Study Help
  

The topic is ADR in Healthcare Malpractice
Write annotated bibliography of at least 150 words for 10 sources comprising of journals only within the last 10 years. TWO OF THOSE JOURNALS SHOULD BE BIBLICALLY RELATED TO THE TOPIC. STRICTLY READ AND ADHERE TO THE INSTRUCTIONS ATTACHED. BE SURE TO FOLLOW THE TEMPLATE ALSO ATTACHED.
PLEASE, IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO DO THIS ASSIGNMENT, DO NOT ACCEPT IT. 
ATTACHED BELOW IS THE RUBRIC, THE ASSIGNMENT GUIDE, AND THE TEMPLATE FOR WRITING ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHIES. FOLLOW THIS TEMPLATE AND THE INSTRUCTIONS.

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 18 to >16.0 pts

Advanced

All key components
are included and
demonstrate
substantial analysis:
• Introduction
• Sources • Analysis

16 to >14.0 pts

Proficient

Sources are listed but
without both
introduction and
analysis.

14 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Sources are listed
without either
introduction or
analysis. Material
submitted fails to meet
the basic requirements
of each component.

0 pts

Not Present

Assignment
fails to show
good faith
effort for
completion.

18 pts

Sources 36 to >32.0 pts

Advanced

All sources meet the
requirements of the
assignment: • At least
10 scholarly sources
other than the
Reading & Study
materials and the
Bible are included.
• At least 2 sources
related to the
student’s area of
practice are included.
• At least 2 sources
related to biblical
worldview are
included. • Each
citation includes a
brief description of the
content of the source.
• Each citation
includes an
explanation of the
source’s relevance to
the paper.

32 to >29.0 pts

Proficient

Most sources meet
the requirements of
the assignment: • At
least 10 scholarly
sources other than the
Reading & Study
materials and the
Bible are included.
• At least 2 sources
related to the
student’s area of
practice are included.
• At least 2 sources
related to biblical
worldview are
included. • Each
citation includes a
brief description of the
content of the source.
• Each citation
includes an
explanation of the
source’s relevance to
the paper.

29 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Sources are lacking, or
fail to meet the
requirements of the
assignment: • At least
10 scholarly sources
other than the Reading
& Study materials and
the Bible are included.
• At least 2 sources
related to the student’s
area of practice are
included. • At least 2
sources related to
biblical worldview are
included. • Each
citation includes a brief
description of the
content of the source.
• Each citation
includes an
explanation of the
source’s relevance to
the paper.

0 pts

Not Present

Sources are
not submitted
at all or lack
description or
explanation.

36 pts

ADR in Healthcare Malpractice: Annotated Bibliography Grading
Rubric | BUSI506_B03_202140

Criteria Ratings Points

Grammar/Spelling 7 to >6.0 pts

Advanced

Correct spelling and
grammar are used
throughout. There are
0–2 errors in grammar
or spelling that
distract the reader
from the content.

6 to >5.0 pts

Proficient

There are 3–5 errors
in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader
from the content.

5 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There are 6–10 errors
in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader
from the content.

0 pts

Not Present

There are
more than 10
errors in the
grammar or
spelling that
distract the
reader from
the content
OR there is
evidence of a
complete lack
of
spell-checking
and
proofreading.

7 pts

APA Format
Compliance

14 to >12.0 pts

Advanced

References are cited
in a reference list
format in proper APA
structure. There are
0–2 minor errors in
APA format in the
required citations.

12 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

References are cited
in a reference list
format in proper APA
structure. There are
3-5 minor errors in
APA format in the
required citations.

11 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There are more than 5
errors in APA format in
the required items
and/or required
citations are missing.

0 pts

Not Present

Required
citations do
not exist or
demonstrate
no APA
formatting or
structure.

14 pts

Total Points: 75

ADR in Healthcare Malpractice: Annotated Bibliography Grading
Rubric | BUSI506_B03_202140

BUSI 506

ADR in Healthcare Malpractice: Annotated Bibliography Assignment Instructions

The ADR in Healthcare Malpractice: Annotated Bibliography and the ADR in Healthcare Malpractice: Research Paper are related assignments that require you to research and write a review of the existing literature and, then, develop the information from your sources into a research paper. Both your research and the paper will explore the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in healthcare, including options for Bible-based dispute resolution, focusing on the issues raised in using ADR to resolve malpractice claims without, or limiting, litigation. The paper will ask you to make recommendations in your field and facility, but the larger focus should be ADR and malpractice.

In the ADR in Healthcare Malpractice: Annotated Bibliography Assignment, identify and discuss at least ten scholarly sources relevant to the topic, other than the Learn materials and the Bible. At least two of the sources must relate to your particular area of practice in healthcare (physician, nurse, allied health professional [be specific], administration, etc.), and at least two of the sources must relate to biblical worldview considerations of the topic. You are not required to use all these sources in your ADR in Healthcare Malpractice: Research Paper, and you may use other sources not reported here. The ADR in Healthcare Malpractice: Annotated Bibliography Assignment documents your background on this topic and provides a snapshot of your research and analysis for the paper.

Compose your annotated bibliography in a Word document, and include the following:
· Identification, Title: Create an APA-formatted title page, running headers, and page numbers. No abstract is needed.
· Introduction: Provide a brief overview of the topic and findings of the Annotated Bibliography. Identify your area of practice.
· Sources: List your sources in alphabetical order by author. For each source, provide a full citation in current APA format (as it would appear in the reference list of your Research Paper); then, provide (i) a brief description of the content and (ii) how this source is relevant to your paper.
· Analysis: Discuss what conclusions you have drawn from reviewing the literature so far. Where might the discussion proceed as you write your Research Paper?

BUSI 511
Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
1

Research Project Annotated Bibliography Template

Criterion prompts to consider for bibliography content:

· A brief statement regarding the author and his or her credentials as an authority.
· A concise statement regarding the relevance of the article for your topic.
· A salient or meaningful quote from the article that you would likely cite if you were to write an essay on this topic.

Do not include this first page of the instructions in your Annotated Bibliography—it is provided here only for instructional purposes. Your Annotated Bibliography will have the above title and start with the below section.

Annotated Bibliography

(Name)

School of Business, Liberty University

Statement of Topic

Kiyonaga (2004) suggests “the aging of the largest generation the United States has ever known will affect every social institution from employment to health care. Precisely what the impact will be is, like all future events, still a matter of prediction. That there will be a major impact is not” (p. 357). This paper will seek to provide a perspective on the aging of the workforce with specific attention given to: the potential roles available for the aging worker, the training available and offered the aging worker, an exploration of implications for the organization, and finally the role the strategic HR function plays in propelling the organization forward in dealing with this issue.

Kondrasuk, J. N., Moore, H. L., & Wang, H. (2001). Negligent hiring: The emerging

contributor to workplace violence in the public sector. Public Personnel

Management, 30(2), 185. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=74623315&Fmt=2&clientId=20655&RQT=309&VName=PQD

This article contributes significant and relevant statistics which confirm the pervasiveness of violent incidents in general. The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) found that 20 persons were murdered at work every week. Nationally, homicide is the second highest overall cause of workplace-related deaths; for female workers, homicide is the leading cause of workplace deaths. Workplace violence now accounts for 15 percent of the more than 6.5 million violent acts experienced by U. S. residents who are age 12 or older (para 7). Kondrasuk provides information also related to a suggested cause or contributor to the violence—negligent hiring practices. Numerous suggestions are given throughout the materials researched for the paper, giving additional thought to the causes of workplace violence. However, Kondrasuk gives weight to not only a passing platitude, but supports the concept of negligent hiring with law and concurrent tort law claims.

Smith, S. J. (2002). Workplace violence. Professional Safety, 47(11), 34. Retrieved from

http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=239545531&Fmt=2&clientId=20655&RQT=309&VName=PQD

Smith (2002) gives critical analysis to the topic of workplace violence and highlights how ill-prepared most U.S. companies are when faced with the reality of violence. In the research, she provides several real world examples of workplace violence, the behavioral backgrounds and pre-incident behaviors of the employees committing the violent acts. Smith (2002) further contends that “employers have both a legal duty and moral obligation to provide a safe workplace” (p. 39). In addition to this insight, the article contributes to the impact, causes, and prevention of workplace violence. The suggestions are pliable to almost any organization.

Continue for remaining references…

error: Content is protected !!