Chat with us, powered by LiveChat you will apply the logic model to design a plan for the inputs, outputs, and outcomes of your health - Study Help
  

you will apply the logic model to design a plan for the inputs, outputs, and outcomes of your health care barrier or issue.

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points

HLT-494 HLT-494-O500 Logic Model 25.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned

Content 70.0%

Health Issue and Population Affected 10.0% The description of the health issue and population affected is not present. The description of the health issue and population affected is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. The description of the health issue and population affected is present. The description of the health issue and population affected is detailed. The description of the health issue and population affected is thorough.

Proposed Intervention and Supporting Theory 10.0% The description of the proposed intervention and supporting theory is not present. The description of the proposed intervention and supporting theory is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. The description of the proposed intervention and supporting theory is present. The description of the proposed intervention and supporting theory is detailed. The description of the proposed intervention and supporting theory is thorough.

Inputs Needed for Proposed Intervention 10.0% The description of inputs needed for the proposed intervention is not present. The description of inputs needed for the proposed intervention is present but lacks details or is incomplete. The description of inputs needed for the proposed intervention is present. The description of inputs needed for the proposed intervention is detailed. The description of inputs needed for the proposed intervention is thorough.

Activities Needed for Proposed Intervention 10.0% The description of activities needed for the proposed intervention is not present. The description of activities needed for the proposed intervention is present but lacks details or is incomplete. The description of activities needed for the proposed intervention is present. The description of activities needed for the proposed intervention is detailed. The description of activities needed for the proposed intervention is thorough.

Outputs Resulting From Activities 10.0% The description of outputs resulting from the activities is not present. The description of outputs resulting from the activities is present but lacks details or is incomplete. The description of outputs resulting from the activities is present. The description of outputs resulting from the activities is detailed. The description of outputs resulting from the activities is thorough.

Short-Term, Intermediate , and Long-Term Outcomes 20.0% The description of short-term, intermediate, and long-term outcomes is not present. The description of short-term, intermediate, and long-term outcomes is present but lacks details or is incomplete. The description of short-term, intermediate, and long-term outcomes is present. The description of short-term, intermediate, and long-term outcomes is detailed. The description of short-term, intermediate, and long-term outcomes is thorough.

Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%

Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Format 10.0%

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Total Weightage 100%

HLT-494 Capstone Project Approval Form

Student Name:
Instructor:

A professional capstone project should highlight the areas in which you have gained proficiency in all your health care administration courses to date. With this in mind, you must select a topic that will address a health care barrier that is relevant to health care administration and does not focus on patient care, rather improving some focus of health care in a manner that may be accomplished, implemented, and evaluated by those in health care administration.
A short description of the general proposed scope of your project (addressing technology, efficiency, access, quality, etc.):

The anticipated health care organization (HCO) that would best benefit from this proposal (hospital, health clinic, dental office, insurance organization, etc.):

Briefly suggest how this proposal will address a health care administration issue and not a clinical issue (reduce turnover, data link, wearable data, identify resources for determinants of health, etc.:

© 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

error: Content is protected !!